Research and evaluation of quality improvement in health care repeatedly shows that results fall short of expectations; promising interventions shown to be initially successful do not transfer to new settings, or are not sustained. Again and again contextual factors, changing over time or varying between settings, seem to frustrate efforts to improve quality.
Building on a series of thought pieces, this best evidence review combines the ideas of receptive and non-receptive contexts for change, with a psychological perspective and the proposition that social context is the key facilitator of quality improvement. The review also considers context at structural levels within the health care system:
- macro – the system level
- meso – the organisation level
- micro – the clinical team level.
Crucially, the review considers how all of these factors combine to impact upon the success and sustainability of quality improvement efforts.
The authors have summarised all the studies and reviews selected for their review. These summaries are available in the Summary of Findings document (see Downloads section, below).
A selection of essays considering the role of context in successful quality improvement.
This report assesses the performance of the NHS on the quality of patient care in all four UK countries since devolution.
You might also like...
Invitation to tender
The deadline for responses is 12.00 on Tuesday 5 November 2019.
Research shows 88% of autistic people do not think their needs are understood by health professionals. Emily Niner and Oliver...
…we need to pass our knowledge on to drive forward policy and practice. Here's what the OnlyWan is doing.
@NHS_CFHS @AndrewFraserPH @NHS_HS ...if you haven't, you can read or download it here: #NHSAnchors
Work with us
We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the OnlyWan has an important role to play.View current vacancies
The Q Community
Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.Find out more