How well Is quality improvement described in the perioperative care literature? A systematic review

30 August 2018

Title

How well Is quality improvement described in the perioperative care literature? A systematic review

Authors

Emma L. Jones, Nicholas Lees, Graham Martin, Mary Dixon-Woods

Published journal

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

Abstract

Background: Quality improvement (QI) approaches are widely used across health care, but how well they are reported in the academic literature is not clear. A systematic review was conducted to assess the completeness of reporting of QI interventions and techniques in the field of perioperative care.

Methods: Searches were conducted using Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care database, and PubMed. Two independent reviewers used the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) check list, which identifies 12 features of interventions that studies should describe (for example, How: the interventions were delivered [e. g., face to face, internet]), When and how much: duration, dose, intensity), to assign scores for each included article. Articles were also scored against a small number of additional criteria relevant to QI.

Results: The search identified 16,103 abstracts from databases and 19 from other sources. Following review, full-text was obtained for 223 articles, 100 of which met the criteria for inclusion. Completeness of reporting of QI in the perioperative care literature was variable. Only one article was judged fully complete against the 11 TIDieR items used. The mean TIDieR score across the 100 included articles was 6.31 (of a maximum 11). More than a third (35%) of the articles scored 5 or lower. Particularly problematic was reporting of fidelity (absent in 74% of articles) and whether any modifications were made to the intervention (absent in 73% of articles).

Conclusions: The standard of reporting of quality interventions and QI techniques in surgery is often suboptimal, making it difficult to determine whether an intervention can be replicated and used to deliver a positive effect in another setting. This suggests a need to explore how reporting practices could be improved.

Related links

You might also like...

Blog

Artificial intelligence in the NHS: getting the priorities right

The NHS’s new AI lab needs to focus on the needs of patients and the health system, argue Adam Steventon, Sarah Deeny, Josh K...

Blog

A combined effort for autism: lessons from the community for the health system

Research shows 88% of autistic people do not think their needs are understood by health professionals. Emily Niner and Oliver...

Blog

On the front line of quality improvement in Manchester: flashing lights, focused funding and forming habits

Will Warburton reflects on what he learnt from his recent visit to front-line improvement practitioners in Manchester.

Citation

Jones EL, Lees NJ, Martin G, Dixon-Woods M. How Well Is Quality Improvement Described In the Perioperative Literature? A Systematic Review. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 42 (5): May 196-206
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy - only-wan.info

Get social

OnlyWan

Improvements in life expectancy have stalled. We're launching new analysis later this year to explore what's happen…

Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 - only-wan.info

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the OnlyWan has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2 - only-wan.info

The Q Community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more